Every procurement leader has an AI opinion right now, and most of them contradict each other. It’s either going to replace half the profession within five years, or it’s an expensive way to get confidently wrong answers faster. The truth, unsurprisingly, sits somewhere in the middle, and it depends almost entirely on what you’re using it for.
To get a clearer picture of where AI is genuinely moving the needle in procurement, and where it still falls short, we sat down with Alexander Jaiyesimi, founder of SupplierSense.ai.
Alexander brings more than 14 years’ procurement experience across JLL, Foster + Partners, ENGIE and procurement roles supporting Transport for London services. Across each organisation, he saw the same problem.
Procurement teams were spending hours tracking news, analysing financial reports and chasing supplier questionnaires, often from the very suppliers least likely to disclose emerging issues. The intelligence existed, but it was fragmented, hard to interpret and rarely available when decisions needed to be made.
SupplierSense.ai is his answer to that problem. The platform applies the supplier-risk and ESG assurance discipline he built across enterprise portfolios, automatically surfacing financial signals, sanctions exposure, ESG risk, adverse media and ownership-control indicators. The result is that procurement teams can spend their time making informed decisions rather than collecting data.
Where AI in Procurement Is Already Earning Its Keep
Alexander is clear that the value isn’t in AI as a concept, it’s in a handful of specific jobs it does well. Top of the list is speed: pulling insight out of large, messy data sets far faster than any team could manually. Benchmarking is another strong use case, giving procurement teams a quicker read on where their pricing or terms sit against the market. And then there’s supplier due diligence, which is where a lot of the manual grind in procurement still lives, and where AI can do in minutes what used to take days.
And the returns are real for those who get it right. Deloitte’s 2025 Global CPO Survey found that procurement’s “Digital Masters” achieved an average 3.2x return on their generative AI investment, roughly double that of their peers.
The Garbage In, Garbage Out Problem
None of that comes without risk, and Alexander doesn’t sugarcoat it. Feed an AI tool poor quality or incomplete data, and it will hand back poor quality conclusions dressed up in confident, well-formatted language. Hallucination is the other risk procurement teams need to take seriously: AI tools that generate plausible-sounding information that simply isn’t true. The output can look polished enough that it’s tempting to trust it without checking, which is exactly when things go wrong.
Data quality is the most common stumbling block. In ProcureAbility’s 2026 CPO Benchmark, half of procurement leaders named data quality as the top barrier to scaling AI, while Deloitte’s Global CPO GenAI Survey found CPOs ranked poor data among the biggest internal barriers to AI adoption, warning it leads to inaccurate outcomes and misinformed decisions.
Beyond the Point-in-Time PQQ
SupplierSense.ai was built to address the gaps between periodic supplier assessments. It complements questionnaires with external public-source intelligence, bringing together financial indicators, Companies House data, sanctions screening, adverse media and ESG signals into one interpreted view. Instead of relying solely on a static snapshot, procurement teams can refresh their view of supplier risk and, where monitoring is enabled, receive alerts on relevant changes.
The Real Cost of Doing It Manually
Instead of relying solely on a static snapshot, procurement teams can refresh their view of supplier risk and, where monitoring is enabled, receive alerts on relevant changes. Automating the data-gathering side doesn’t remove the need for procurement judgement, but it frees up that expensive time for the parts of the job that actually need a human.
Fix Your Process Before You Pick a Tool
Asked what he’d tell a CPO just starting to explore AI, Alexander’s advice has nothing to do with technology at all: fix your process first. Bringing AI into a broken workflow doesn’t fix the workflow, it just makes the bad process faster. Teams that get the most out of AI are the ones who’ve already worked out what good looks like, and are using the technology to do more of it, not the ones hoping the tool will paper over the cracks.
It’s a lesson many are still learning. The 2026 ProcureCon CPO Report found that nearly every procurement leader now uses AI in some form, yet 54% say insufficient data quality and cross-system integration are holding them back. Adoption is widespread, but getting the foundations right is still where most teams are stuck. That’s exactly why Alexander’s advice starts with the process, not the platform.
Where AI Excels, and Where Human Judgement Still Wins
Not every category is equally suited to AI, and Alexander is careful to draw that line. Routine and tail-spend activities offer clear opportunities for automation. In high-risk, high-spend strategic categories, AI can still strengthen analysis and supplier intelligence, while procurement professionals retain responsibility for decisions, relationships and commercial judgement.
What comes through in talking to Alexander is that the procurement teams getting real value from AI aren’t the ones chasing every new tool. They’re the ones who’ve been honest about their process, clear on where judgement still matters, and deliberate about where they let the technology take the strain.
The team at Bramwith have access to a wide range of procurement professionals with the relevant skills to help your business navigate this shift, from category managers who know how to put the right process in place before any tool is chosen, to leaders experienced in building genuinely AI-ready procurement functions. Get in touch today to find out how we can help your business find that talent.









